Peer selection rationale
Comparable organizations are organized around the factors boards expect to see documented: field, scale, geography, and role alignment.
ArtMetrics Pro gives your practice a documented peer-selection workflow, editable report files, and the source trail boards need when reviewing executive compensation.
The Pro page should lead with the artifact your client eventually sees: a board-facing comparability report with peer rationale, compensation benchmarks, and methodology notes. The sample PDF is the clearest proof of value.
Comparable organizations are organized around the factors boards expect to see documented: field, scale, geography, and role alignment.
Percentile tables and summary ranges give the board a practical view of where the proposed compensation sits.
The report keeps the data trail close to the recommendation, reducing the handwork required to support the final packet.
Pro is designed to make the comparability process easier to document, not to hide judgment behind automation.
ArtMetrics provides comparability data and report automation for nonprofit compensation review. It does not provide legal, tax, or accounting advice. Consultants and client boards should review final recommendations with qualified counsel or tax advisors as appropriate.